March 20, 2005
-
Symmetry is Boring; I am Beautiful.
© The Author, 2005I am very tall. I am creative. I am extraordinarily loving and opinionated. I have acne scars. I care about my community. My teeth are enormous. I like to go running. My ass is round. My tits, however, are not. Symmetry is boring; I am beautiful.
Last week’s episode of the WB reality series, The Starlet had me foaming at the mouth. The show, which I had been eager to watch, has turned out to be blatant in its disrespect to women, and last week it felt directly insulting to my body in particular.
While I generally expect the quiet oppression of women in all mainstream media, I had for some reason, expected more from this show. It seemed to have the potential to demonstrate that acting is a difficult profession and a challenging craft; it had the opportunity to show that women in the media are more than “sexy” bodies and predictably pretty faces—they are artists. Or at least, some of them are. I guess I was just hoping for some integrity, which was entirely too much to expect from the WB.
For all of those who are not hip to The Starlet, this show provides viewers with the opportunity to watch ten young actresses have their dreams pissed on by Faye Dunaway, Vivica A. Fox, and casting director Joseph Middleton. This panel picks only one young woman to be The Starlet, which entails an acting contract on one of the WB’s insipid teen melodramas.
The ugly(er) underbelly of this particular show, reveals the preparation of these young actresses to continue the disgusting tradition that many starlets have perpetuated before them; the actresses learn to exploit the female form and a woman’s right to an individualized identity (sexual and otherwise), in order to fuel the patriarchal, capitalist machine. This has become obvious in more than one instance on The Starlet, but I’d like to discuss one of the more obvious points first to ease you, my dear reader, into my feminist rant with your comfort in mind.
Both the first and second episode of The Starlet included acting challenges where bikinis were a requisite. I have nothing against the swimwear (I myself enjoy donning as few clothes as possible in the summer heat, and I am all for the right for woman to go topless as our male counterparts have the option of doing), but the episode last week shamelessly implied that if you do happen to prefer a different style of beach gear, you are not only a flabby, out-of shape failure of a woman, but you are also a bad actress. Case in point: Mercedes, a stunning contestant on the show who preferred to wear a sarong with her bikini while doing a screen test for a hideously scripted hair product commercial. At 24, Mercedes is the oldest actress in the house and by far the most seasoned. While the younger actresses obsessed over creating predictable mainstream bodies when they heard that they had been accepted as contestants on the show, it is evident that Mercedes instead focused on attending her acting classes regularly. But with all this bikini wearing, Mercedes expressed in last week’s episode that she wished that she had done a bit more thighwork than scene work. The panel echoed her insecurity, with Vivica Fox producing the particularly catty comment, “you hear that? It’s the gym calling.”
What a bitch.
Not only is Mercedes in no conceivable way fat, but she is in fact thin. She is thin! Her stomach is flat. Her arms do not waggle. Her breasts do not spill. Her butt and thighs, although an admitted insecurity of Mercedes, were not even half the size of one ass cheek belonging to that gargantuant man on the King of Queens. And so what if Mercedes were fat? Who says that fat must equate ugly? Ugly comes in all forms—fat and thin, so Atkins really can’t save you when it comes from escaping the ugly stick. And what is so bad about being ugly, might I add? Why is it that many fat or ugly (or both) men are allowed to be successful, interesting, funny, “good” actors, while beautiful women who happen to on the slender side of average (because as we all know it is the duty of actresses to be on the cutting edge of thin) struggle to be recognized? I’ll tell you why. It’s because the capitalist system perpetuates self-hating behavior on the part of women everywhere in order to sell us shit we don’t need, and truth be told we don’t even want. This goes far deeper than the obvious image issues that Mercedes and women everywhere suffer from. It threatens to follow us into the bedroom.
As we all know from When Harry Met Sally, orgasms are entirely fake-able. Women are well aware of how they are “supposed” to look and sound during climax because of constant efforts of the media to inform us of these things. But certainly every true orgasm is as unique as the person having it, so why would the media want to deceive us so?
According to capitalist pedagogy, if women can be convinced that only the traditional “oohs and ahhs” are appropriate during climax, then they can also be convinced that they all have the same desires and the same fears. This tidy little bundle makes it oh so easy for Victoria’s Secret to sell you a “figure enhancing” bodice (which will undoubtedly cut into your flesh while the un-breathable polyester blend gives you a hellish yeast infection) for $70 U.S. dollars.
That’s the way (uh-huh, uh-huh) Uncle Sam likes it (uh-huh, uh-huh).
Aside from selling us actual items, the capitalist pigs who are in charge have historically been men. To stay on top of the proverbial power fuck, these men also try to sell women a weak and powerless mold to fit into. Sure, you can decline purchase of this mold, but then you will be ostracized and isolated and receive an automatic placement into another category: the FemaNazi Dike Butch Bitch Category. This placement is for women with those pesky little things called emotions and opinions. Only men are allowed those things. Proper women receive barbiturates, complacency to a male dominated culture, and fashions that reinforce their powerlessness.
You know as well as I that those ultra pointy-toed boots with stiletto heels aren’t made for walking. And neither are the emaciated and feeble legs that are shoved into them.
One could easily argue that feminism is advancing in U.S. society and culture. Women, although they make an average of 71 cents to every dollar a man makes, are nevertheless prevalent forces in the workplace. Women, although their reproductive rights are constantly threatened by whatever white man happens to rule their land, nevertheless have choice. Women, although they typically only see themselves portrayed in our culture as being in sexual relationships with men, and when they are with women it is to appease a male fantasy, are nevertheless free to embrace another woman as a lover, a partner, or both. Women, although faced with the light-skinned, straight haired, white ideals of beauty in nearly every facet of our culture, are nevertheless encouraged to embrace the beauty in their ethnic identity. Women, although pressured with daunting diets that produce a skeletal version of beauty, are nevertheless free to embrace their curves. After all, there is another reality show especially for those who make this choice—Kristy Ally’s Fat Actress. But this too is unsatisfactory. Why should the fat actresses be separated from the thin? The game of separating women into clean demographics and categories is getting old.
It is time for us to see beauty in all its forms—fat, thin, and in between. It is time for women to reject the images of what we are supposed to look like and the fashions we are supposed to prefer. It is time for us to writhe in the bedroom how want to. It is time for us to laugh in the face of the predictable, easy to market to robots that the capitalists want us to be.
After watching a very pink Gap ad starring Sarah Jessica Parker singing, “I Enjoy Being a Girl,” my husband recently asked me, “Do you enjoy being a girl?” I didn’t know how to answer. I enjoy my personality. I enjoy my opinions. I enjoy my brain. I enjoy my body. With all the shit that I as a women have to combat on a daily basis just to keep a shred of my actual identity from being snatched up and shit upon by capitalists selling “The American Dream,” it’s a wonder that I can say yes—I enjoy being a girl. I only wish that society could enjoy my womanhood as much as I do.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________An Afterward
As always, thank you for your readership. If there are any points (or counter points) that you felt need to be tossed about on this issue, please feel free to post them in my comment box. In interest of keeping this essay short, I am sure I left crucial points un-discussed and certain arguments un-combated. Open discourse on this topic is the only way to dismantle it, and since media literacy is something few are privy to learning in school, the web seems a likely place for this discussion. Your opinions are important and valuable, and I look forward to hearing them.Also, in pursuit of honesty, I’ve got to tell you: I’m still planning on watching The Starlet this week. I like to try out the acting challenges during the commercial breaks. It’s more entertaining than it deserves to be.
Finally, I’d like to invite you all to participate in Chicagoartgirl23’s The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly Photo Challenge. This will challenge us to take a look at the beauty and the horror in ourselves instead of taking the television’s word for what looks good and bad.
The Rules
If you dare, post a minimum of two pictures of yourself. One must show you at your ugliest. The other must show you at your most beautiful. This does not have to translate into the least/most attractive pictures of yourself. This challenge is open ended in interpretation, but since it is as such, it would be cool if you could post a brief description of why you chose the photos you chose. Once you have done so, drop me a comment—I’m curious to see what you post!My Photo Challenge Results
The Ugly
This is, by far, the ugliest picture I have of myself. I almost ripped it up and threw it away before I realized that it is actually quite hilarious. In this photo I am sunburned, dehydrated, and frustrated. I snapped this picture myself because I wanted to see what an openly irritated me looks like. I am a ham for the camera, so I did sprout this expression intentionally, but it comes from deep within my monstrous self. An openly irritated me is not only ugly to look at—more importantly its ugly to feel and ugly to be around. After seeing the startling physical manifestation in this picture, I was reminded of the importance of keeping my cool—if only not to frighten young children who might see me. Plus, it’s an effing funny picture.
This is a picture that my partner and I took after we made up after a horrible fight on a vacation we took together when we were still dating. The pure happiness is not because we have a love of quarrelling (in fact we seldom fight), but rather because we were able to take comfort in the fact that it was going to be all right. We are actually happy that we are two different people, with two different ways of approaching the world—even when that sometimes results in the occasional argument. We used this picture on our wedding invitation because it reminded us that we are strong—and that is beautiful.
How does beauty flourish/wither in you? ::smile::
Comments (21)
you must be feeling better… i was thinking about this as i sat in the auto lube place this sat reading US – the only non-car mag in the place, and looking at the photos of celebs at their worst. i’m glad i don’t have ppl following me around taking unattractive pics- not that they’d be hard to get but bc they are so easy to take- we look our worst when we are at our best- doing those things we do in everyday life- like sitting in the jiffy lube, walking the dog, letting the person w/ three items go ahead of you- but the camera doesn’t tell the backstory -just the surface truth…. sigh
love the happiness in that pic, btw! you’re both too cute!
the picture of you two is just adorable!
Thank you for your essay! I very much enjoyed reading it and will highly recommend you to all my friends. Reality TV is a guilty pleasure of mine, though I haven’t strayed far from the Mark Burnett camp. I think reality shows are very interesting mirrors to society, as you so eloquently illustrated. Have you published anywhere? Your writing is so clear and poignant, if you haven’t submitted anything, submit! (I myself am way to chicken to submit anything, but I still feel free to urge others to do so .) What started as a humorous observation became a very powerful…I want to say argument, but it was more of a declaration. I’ve had mixed feelings about that Gap commercial. I like that the character is embracing feminity, but I don’t like that she is very narrowly defining it at the same time. I have so much more to say, but I can’t think of it. Feminism, feminity…it’s all so intriguing and relevant, I wish I was more well-read and felt more qualified to…not argue about it (that suggests a male-oriented dichotomy of right and wrong)…but…what’s a good word? Write about, or discuss it I guess.
I really enjoy your site and am glad I stumbled across it during a very long period of boredom at work. I noticed also that you read my site…thanks for your comments. I post blogs mostly due to the urgings from my sister who’s at college. I’m trying to explain its overabundant silliness and irrelevance. Keep adding to your blog, though! I am one (of probably many) subscribers who can’t wait to read what you write next!
I love this essay! Favorite line: “You know as well as I that those ultra pointy-toed boots with stiletto heels aren’t made for walking. And neither are the emaciated and feeble legs that are shoved into them.” So true. Some tiny girl wearing pink pointy-toed heinosities accidentally stabbed my foot with her stilletto the other day on the subway. Maybe she didn’t notice (I mean, who can tell what you step on when you’re three and a half inches removed?), but she certainly didn’t apologize. I would’ve said something if I wasn’t so focused on the fact that my toe was hurting so much that I feared amputation. Anyway, you have used some powerful words here, and they work wonderfully.Re: your pictures. The one of you and your partner is great. But so is the “ugly” one. I don’t think you look ugly at all!
I totally agree. I’m so sick of these mags that come out and try to tell you what you should eat in order to have the perfect body, but what people don’t realize is that yeah you do have to watch what you eat, but you have to exercise too. Plus when people think about dieting they think they have to starve themselves which leads to other problems. You don’t have to do that…you can still eat junk food and all the foods you love, you just have to watch how much you eat of it. Plus people worry too much about beauty on the outside…what about the beauty on the inside? I’ve seen so many guyus whose heads turn at the sight of the skinny blondes with the low jeans (thongs sticking out of them) and the halter tops, and just ignore me because most of the time I’m in jeans and a t-shirt (hey I dress for comfort). My dad tries to get me to dress “cute,” but I feel that if a guy doesn’t like me for who I am, then he’s not worth my time.
Unfortunately, I have worked at a magazine that promoted the noxious myth of the unattainble body. I once opined that we ought to be putting some of the female staffers on the cover and in the photo shoots, and was met with a response somewhere between hysterical laughter and frank horror. I still think it’s a good–well, an honest–idea. I think most readers would rather see normal, healthy women with normal, healthy bodies, not some freak cross between Barbie and a porn star. But then, what do I know?Oddly, I actually DID post my ugliest picture over at my place last week. I think it caused Blogger to crash it was so awful. I’ll work on the “most beautiful” one and get back to you…
And you do NOT have big teeth. I’ll take your word for it on all the other stuff…
I should note also–I like that Sarah Jessica Parker Gap ad. I like that song. I like Sarah Jessica Parker too. My version of womanhood can be pink and girly–but most of the time it prefers hiking boots and running shoes. If Ms. Parker enjoys teetering about New York city blocks on 6 inch heels, I guess I’ll just have to take her word for it. But without media literacy (deconstucting the ad that tells us that tourcherous fashion should be the prefrence for all of us) we run into the danger of beliving that any diversion from that is unacceptable. And that leads to lots of crap! Yay for all the comments!
I’ll take your word that it’s an appalling show. Just don’t slip so easily into that conspiracy-theory tone. Would that cultural problems were so easily pinpointed and remedied! I simply don’t see any grand patriarchy creating shows like that with the concrete goal of oppressing women. What I see is a lot of women watching that show and shows like it and a lot of people of both sexes happy to make money off of them. What I see is a shallow and increasingly snarky culture that is bad for everybody, yet virtually all of us participate in it. Is there sexism in America? Sure there is. But you can’t paint everything with that brush just because it’s the only one in your paintbox. The Gap — to take your example — has used a variety of marketing strategies in its TV ads, and sells some clothes that are not all that “girly.” But “girly” seems to be in right now (if I can believe the Times Style pages), so that’s their current game. And I’m fairly certain they test these ads with focus groups; if they didn’t play well, they wouldn’t make it onto TV. It goes both ways. You can blame The Man if you want to, but ultimately the enemy is us. They show it to us because we want to see it. And while we’re on the subject of negative stereotypes and TV commercials, I’d ask you to find me one single example of a father in a TV commercial who is not an idiot. Just one. The almost complete lack of positive, masculine parental role models in mass media pisses me off, but it’s not a conspiracy. Again, I wish it were that simple. If it were a conspiracy you could uncover it and shoot a few people. Gender roles and stereotypes are much more complicated than that, and that’s why they’re so sticky and hard to change.Anyway, I’m obviously not defending reality shows or TV commercials. Just to put the appropriately inappropriate closing touch on what was probably a semicoherent comment, I think your “ugly” photo is kind of hot. So there. :-p
Nice essay, Chicagoartgirl. You express yourself very well, and I can’t find a thing to disagree with. I only have to say–being a short person–that Sarah Jessica Parker needs to wear those heels just to maintain some kind of eye contact with others. She’s a little, petite person like me and it’s hell being treated like a child just because we are short. Jessica wears heels. I wear platforms. Maybe society forces us into these ridiculous fashions, but often we wear what we wear for reasons of basic survival. In my case, I’m very tired of waving up at somebody’s shoulders and saying “I’m down here. Hello!”I am less accommodating of “Fat Actress” than you are. Okay, I never saw the show. I think all the reality shows are stupid. But, while in a doctor’s waiting room, I read an interview with Kirstie Alley and she came accross as the most self-absorbed, unsympathetic glutton you’d ever meet. She doesn’t care about her own health and she sure the heck doesn’t blame herself for looking the way she does. She admits to eating an entire cheesecake at one sitting. I ask you, is this normal? No, it is not. It’s dangerously unheathful.Maybe we are way too hung up on thinness in our society, but that doesn’t make it right to pig out and expect everyone to love you and tell you that you’re huge and beautiful, because that’s just a big lie. People like Alley are on the path to self-destruction and I don’t think there’s anything attractive about that. Okay, okay, yes, I’m thin. But I’m naturally that way. I don’t diet. I don’t try to stay the way I am. And I wish that for once other women would just accept that about me, instead of assuming I’m a diet freak. And the people who assume that about me always look like Kirstie Alley! LOLWow, that essay sure got a rant out of me! Hey, keep returning to my blog. I interviewed another character from my novel. It’s an interesting technique. BTW, cute pictures–BOTH of them.Lynn
Yay for more discussion! Thanks for your comments everyone! To keep the dialogue rolling, I’d like to clarify a few things that the ever-thoughtful and cool Dr. Perky brought up that I suspect many non-commenting readers might be thinking. I’m not blaming The Man. I’m blaming capitalism. I couldn’t agree with you more when you say, “What I see is a lot of women watching that show and shows like it and a lot of people of both sexes happy to make money off of them.” Perhaps I wasn’t clear in expressing that. Men are great–I like them loads. Not all of them are in the “good ‘ole boys club,” and all the cool ones (of which there are plenty) wouldn’t even want to be. That dosn’t change the fact that there is a good ole boys club and that they are in fact, the ones in power. It’s not a conspirecy-it’s a fact: our culture is dominated by white dudes. Not to say that all white dudes domintate (most don’t), or to completely exclude women from being power players, but look around–white dudes comprise more than half our government and our corporations. “The Man” is not men. “The Man” is a handful of white dudes who control the money. Also, I disagree wholeheartedly with, “they show it to us because we want to see it.” Women’s self worth plummets after they spend 4 mintues with a Vouge. Women in particular have been programed from an early age by society to be what others want them to be: docile, girly, quiet bundles of sugar and spice. Your daughter id different–you are a cool white dude who looks endlessly for orange clothes for her to wear so that if she ends up picking pink Gap clothes later–you know she just really digs them. How many people can say they have as cool of a parent as you? Most just buy the damn barbies and pink thingies. You are right-there are many reasons for socital problems and you can’t blame just one thing. But we’ve got to start somewhere, right? Good fathers in the media: Atticus Fitch from To Kill a Mockingbird. I want him to be my dad! But you’re right-after that I’m drawing a blank.
So true about the dads on commercials. And let’s get real–all white adults with kids are idiots on commercials. The mom is allowed to have half a brain now and then, but it’s the kids who are always the real brains in the household. Now how realistic is THAT?Having worked in the newspaper biz for a zillion years, I have to say that the line “we give them what they want” is actually true. When we tried to run serious stories, circulation dropped. When we played the blood and guts, it went up. When we played up Michael Jackson, it went through the ceiling. I don’t know exactly how this relates to Vogue, but (most) people want to read about the horrible and the bizarre. Everyone says “why don’t they show good news now and then?” That’s because it’s, by definition, not news. News is something out of the ordinary. Once in a while a good story breaks out: the Chicago Tribune ran a column and then a follow-up story on a kid who lost his dog and the slimy creep who tried to keep it. Boy was reunited with dog and everyone loved it.As for the models, I don’t know what to say. Have you ever met a clothing designer? Most are off in another world, so far from reality you can’t believe it. They want their clothing shown on the proper body, which to them is gaunt and haunted-looking.Magazines have tried to show the “real women.” (God, how I hate that phrase. We are ALL real.), but readers actually reject it! I know from going to journalism conventions. The editors don’t understand it either.I don’t know what the answer is. I really don’t. Our country outpaces almost any other in obesity, yet we hail the Calista Flockharts of the works as raving beauties. Something is seriously out of whack.Lynn
Nice post, you really got folks chiming in on this one!If it weren’t for all the children exposed to the media marketing madness, my response would be, c’est la vie. I ignore what offends me and laugh at the rest. As anyone over the age of 18 should. Most of it is, in it’s ludicrousness (not a word), highly entertaining. But that’s because I recognize the point behind it all, which is to make us *want* something enough to reach into our wallets and spend $$$$. Such a siren song. So of course they’re going to play on all the fantasy body images, sexual desires, and social acceptance cliches. It makes people spend their money. But children have no such defense against the steady stream. In fact, the steady stream to them is reality, and they are so shaped. That is the crime that makes me foam at the mouth.But fear not artgirl – the image of strong, powerful women is out there selling products too. Competing with the other, the weak, stick-legged bimbo thing. Balancing it. Representing the rest of us. Beautifully. May I be an old fart here for just a minute, my young friend, and mention that in my lifetime, I have seen enormous progress in real terms toward equal footing, equal representation, equal power, equal opportunity. I have seen warp speed change. We are light years from where we were just 40 years ago. I talk to little girls these days and they all play soccer or street hockey or basketball, aren’t afraid of math, and want to be astronauts and CEO’s and President. I’m awed and amazed at their physical prowess, their confidence, their utter disregard for the crap that pours out of the media. Madison Avenue is not the real world. It is interested in profit and sex sells and we all know that. Let them be depraved and twisted and narrow and misogynistic, or portray fathers as bumbling idiots. Who gives a fuck. As long as there are little girls and boys growing up today with moms and dads like Kathy and David Walbert and Nina and Jack (whatever their real names are) and Caz and Karos and LikeWowMom and all the rest, we’re going to be ok. Society will be ok. The greedy profit whores are not the center of the universe. Unless we let them be.
I hope we’ll be okay. But those kids who want grow up. And not all grown ups are as savy as you sandiegogrl. And not all parents are paying due attention to their kids. I’m a beliver in the village raising the child (especially since parents are working 24/7 now), and our village is pretty hostile to women. We have come a long way, but there is still a lot of work to be done. Thanks for your insight–it is really great.
I agree that two heavy an emphasis is placed on appearance, but it is the way things are currently. If the show is going to be accurately preparing these women for starlet-dom, then they need to be prepared to have the weight ridiculously considered, if nothing else, Vivica’s callous remarks taught that lady to have a thicker skin. I am an avid watcher of America’s Next Top Model, which is only about appearances. They spent this weeks episode testing the contestants on how cool and supportive they could be while working with a horrible photographer. No, it wasn’t nice, but it was accurate. I’m impressed that these shows do not sugar coat the pill. When they say prepare, they mean prepare.
Of course, in an ideal world, they wouldn’t needed to prepare actress hopefuls to become body image obsessed, and we’re working towards that.
Does Atticus Fitch count since he is a character in a novel first published in 1960?
I can’t tell if he dosn’t count, or if he counts even more becuase of that…
In the case of TV, we can expect things to be especially egregious. Network programmers are enthralled with the idea of catching the eyes of the 18-34 male demographic. The thought here is that a) they are less set in their brand purchasing patters, and b) they have higher earning and decision-making potential than women. The second point is incredibly sexist, I know, but it’s what TV execs believe. So they can air this kind of trash not caring about how many women they depress because they want the men tuning in for the titillation factor. The guys who tune in to see beautiful women are, well, guys … but the darker underbelly here is that there are probably guys who tune in enjoying the idea of seeing beautiful women humiliated. This is a pathology that is more common than people care to admit.The idea of males dominating the target demographic can be seen best in the fantasy pairings we see in sitcoms (particularly on CBS). How many permutations of the big, fat, oafish man married to gorgeous, pixie-ish, smart woman can we take before we want to retch. But it’s a bit of escapism that tells those lonely 18-34 males that, hey, if a lummox like Kevin James can score a hot wife, then you don’t need to show any positive character traits to do just as well. Just, you know, buy the stuff advertised during the show.Yikes. That’s a rant. But thanks for the opportunity. Great essay, by the way.
Well Stated Tim’s Head!
Well, I still insist that if nobody watched those shows they wouldn’t be on TV. Somebody is watching them. Nielson says so. If nobody bought Glamour they wouldn’t publish it, etc. I’m not debating the self-esteem issue, but I’m also not backing off my assertion that people enjoy this stuff on some level at the same time — there is something more complicated psychologically going on which might be interested to study if anybody could do it without their own politics and assumptions getting in the way (BWAHAHA, imagine such a thing in academia!). As for fat dumbass-marries-hot-chick TV shows, (1) to whom is that really more degrading? I’d rather be a witty sex object with bad taste in men than a fat dumbass with great taste in women, and (2) there are other shows aimed at other demographics — which are equally stupid, of course. But I really watch almost nothing on TV anymore except sports, so when I see commercials in other programming I feel really out of place, like I’ve accidentally driven into the wrong neighborhood. Sometimes I like to play a little game I call “Who the Hell Do They Think Is Watching This?” Apparently Food Network used to think Iron Chef was watched by people who needed the Clapper, for example. Now if you will please excuse me, I have to go eat several burritos and buy a bigger pickup truck, because my current one is not sufficiently manly.
TimsHead makes a dark and brilliant point: men wanting to see women humiliated. Is this backlash for all the dumb white men we see on commercials and in sitcoms? I’m not sure what have sparked this backlash, but it is indeed ugly.I have to admit the only reality show I ever say was “Joe Millionaire” and it was only because I wanted to see just how stupid things could be. From the looks of that thing, we have scraped the bottom of the barrel. The whole show was based on a lie and then women fight, claw and scratch to get their man–who’s not a millionaire but just a stupid liar. What kind of messages does this send anyone? It’s humiliating for everyone, male and female. But it does tell us that the hunt for the almighty dollar means more than shared interests, trusty, honesty, and deep values–all of which are essential for a meaningful relationship.My solution is to watch “The Daily Show.” That’s what’s really happening. Fake news. Turn it on.LynnP.S. Atticus Finch does not count because he was from a movie of another era. We are talking about stupid fathers on dumb TV shows airing right now.